Re: [PATCH] Documentation/Makefile: fix "make info" regression in dad9cd7d518

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 09:56:20PM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> Fix a regression in my dad9cd7d518 (Makefile: move ".SUFFIXES" rule to
> shared.mak, 2022-03-03). As explained in the GNU make documentation
> for the $* variable, available at:
> 
> 	info make --index-search='$*'
> 
> This rule relied on ".texi" being in the default list of suffixes, as
> seen at:
> 
> 	make -f/dev/null -p | grep -v -e ^# -e ^$|grep -F .SUFFIXES
> 
> The documentation explains what was going on here:
> 
> 	In an explicit rule, there is no stem; so '$*' cannot be determined
> 	in that way.  Instead, if the target name ends with a recognized
> 	suffix (*note Old-Fashioned Suffix Rules: Suffix Rules.), '$*' is
> 	set to the target name minus the suffix.  For example, if the
> 	target name is 'foo.c', then '$*' is set to 'foo', since '.c' is a
> 	suffix.  GNU 'make' does this bizarre thing only for compatibility
> 	with other implementations of 'make'.  You should generally avoid
> 	using '$*' except in implicit rules or static pattern rules.
> 
> 	If the target name in an explicit rule does not end with a
> 	recognized suffix, '$*' is set to the empty string for that rule.
> 
> I.e. this rule added back in 5cefc33bffd (Documentation: add
> gitman.info target, 2007-12-10) was resolving gitman.texi from
> gitman.info. We can instead just use the more obvious $< variable
> referring to the prerequisite.
> 
> This was the only use of $* in our Makefiles in an explicit rule, the
> three remaining ones are all implicit rules, and therefore didn't
> depend on the ".SUFFIXES" list.
> 
> Reported-by: Adam Dinwoodie <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> On Tue, Apr 05 2022, Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
> 
> > With this commit, I get the same noisy warnings, but I also get the
> > error "could not open .texi: No such file or directory".
> 
> Sorry about the regression. This fixes it, and as noted above I'm
> pretty sure this was the only fallout of the change.
> 
> (I didn't have building the full extended documentation as part of my
> local build, but I'll be adding it now).

Confirmed this patch fixes things for me.  Thanks for the quick fix!

Tested-by: Adam Dinwoodie <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux