Hi Junio On 31/03/2022 21:37, Junio C Hamano wrote:
"Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
It also made me wonder if "-z" alone should be made to imply "--porcelain" (in other words, is there a good reason to ask for NUL-terminated output when you are producing a human-readable output?), but we can start stricter like this patch does; we can later loosen it if needed.
That's a good point about "-z" implying "--porcelain" we do something similar for "git status -z" I think.
Best Wishes Phillip