<rsbecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>I have some indefinite plans to improve the support for >>SHA-1/SHA-256 interop in the future, as well as port SHA-256 >>support to libgit2, but those are dependent on some things which >>are not certain (but very likely) to occur. That is encouraging to hear. SHA-256 interop is one of the things I want to see appear sooner rather than later (it would be what I would answer to the popular "Git Rev News" question, if I were interviewed). I certainly would want it to materialize before I retire ;-) >>I strongly encourage folks to add SHA-256 repository support to >>tooling since it's likely going to become more popular in the >>future. I have some local SHA-256 repositories on my systems and >>they appear to work fine. > > Our tooling works correctly regardless of the choice of SHA-256, > but have been waiting for GitHub et. al., to provide > capabilities. I would welcome interoperability. What help do you > need?
