Re: Submodule usability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 29 Sep 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

> Hi Daniel
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 01:24:53PM -0400, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> > 
> > Also, would it be reasonable to have a gitmodules option for submodules 
> > that the supermodule doesn't make sense without? E.g., multiple projects 
> > are now using kbuild as their build system,
> 
> Out of couriosity...
> I know of busybox and klibc.
> Are there any others using kbuild these days?
> 
> I see that several build system share some ideas with kbuild
> which I btw am glad to see.
> But if there are enough project taking benefit of kbuild I should
> maybe revisit my idea to factor out all the common stuff somehow.

I'm only sure of busybox and klibc (3 including the kernel is "multiple"), 
but IIRC a number of linux-specific userspace projects seem awfully 
similar. I wouldn't be surprised if the build systems that currently share 
only ideas would share code if it were factored out.

	-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux