Re: [PATCH 2/2] Replace literal STRLEN_ #defines in refs.h with compiler evaluated expressions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Sat, 29 Sep 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
> I do not think the above is wrong per se, but doesn't a good
> compiler optimize
> 
> 	#define PATH_REMOTES	"remotes/"
> 	#define STRLEN_PATH_REMOTES strlen(PATH_REMOTES)

Gcc does, yes.

HOWEVER.

Using "strlen()" may be optimized at compile-time, but it still ends up 
resulting in illegal C code if the constant needs to be a constant in the 
semantic sense.

IOW, the "sizeof()" trick can be portably used for things like array 
declarations etc. But strlen() cannot. Ie

	char array[sizeof("hello")-1];

is legal in non-function scope, but doing the same with "strlen()" is not.

(That said, gcc has been known to accept bad C code, and will in fact 
accept this one too!)

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux