Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Calvin and I discussed details of implementation before he wrote these > patches, and my thinking at that time was that to get the relevant > information, we're prepared to fetch the objects themselves from the > remote if need be, but prefer to fetch only metadata if possible, so > putting it in "fetch" seemed reasonable to me. But I agree that it's > probably better to put it somewhere else. Yeah, I am sympathetic that every "learning something from remote" looks like a "fetch". After all, a remote blame may be "fetching the result of running blame". But it may not be a good way to decide what the feature should be called. Thanks.
