Re: [PATCH] test-lib-functions: fix test_subcommand_inexact

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] test-lib-functions: fix test_subcommand_inexact
From: Abhradeep Chakraborty <chakrabortyabhradeep79@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 13:43:14 +0530
Cc: Abhradeep Chakraborty <chakrabortyabhradeep79@xxxxxxxxx>, git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@xxxxxxxxxx>, Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <xmqqy20yeuri.fsf@gitster.g>
References: <xmqqy20yeuri.fsf@gitster.g>

Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> ... How much fuzziness we tolerate is something
> that must be made clear to help developers who may potentially want
> to use it, and the phrase "inexact" alone would not help us.

Yep! I agree.

Thanks :)

References:
- Re: [PATCH] test-lib-functions: fix test_subcommand_inexact
  - From: Junio C Hamano

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] core.fsync: new option to harden references
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 26/27] t/lib-unicode-nfc-nfd: helper prereqs for testing unicode nfc/nfd
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] test-lib-functions: fix test_subcommand_inexact
Next by thread: [PATCH v2 0/2] test-lib-functions: fix test_subcommand_inexact
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux