On Wed, Mar 23 2022, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> diff --git a/revision.c b/revision.c
>> index 303d1188207..90bac9ada03 100644
>> --- a/revision.c
>> +++ b/revision.c
>> @@ -2933,6 +2933,13 @@ static void release_revisions_commit_list(struct rev_info *revs)
>> revs->commits = NULL;
>> }
>>
>> +void release_revisions(struct rev_info *revs)
>> +{
>> + if (!revs)
>> + return;
>> + object_array_clear(&revs->pending);
>> +}
>
> Yay.
>
> It is unclear why we want to allow passing NULL to this, though. Do
> we even have any code paths that allocate on-heap rev-info? Address
> of an on-stack or global rev_info will never be NULL.
I'm almost certain it's boilerplate from early testing, and running the
tests with it removed just now passed.
I'll make a bit more sure sure it's OK (with SANITIZE=address et al) and
drop it in a v3.
