On Sun, Mar 20 2022, Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget wrote: > From: Neeraj Singh <neerajsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > The update-index functionality is used internally by 'git stash push' to > setup the internal stashed commit. > > This change enables bulk-checkin for update-index infrastructure to > speed up adding new objects to the object database by leveraging the > batch fsync functionality. > > There is some risk with this change, since under batch fsync, the object > files will be in a tmp-objdir until update-index is complete. This > usage is unlikely, since any tool invoking update-index and expecting to > see objects would have to synchronize with the update-index process > after passing it a file path. > > Signed-off-by: Neeraj Singh <neerajsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > builtin/update-index.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/builtin/update-index.c b/builtin/update-index.c > index 75d646377cc..38e9d7e88cb 100644 > --- a/builtin/update-index.c > +++ b/builtin/update-index.c > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ > */ > #define USE_THE_INDEX_COMPATIBILITY_MACROS > #include "cache.h" > +#include "bulk-checkin.h" > #include "config.h" > #include "lockfile.h" > #include "quote.h" > @@ -1110,6 +1111,9 @@ int cmd_update_index(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) > > the_index.updated_skipworktree = 1; > > + /* we might be adding many objects to the object database */ > + plug_bulk_checkin(); > + Shouldn't this be after parse_options_start()?