Re: [PATCH 0/7] More i18n fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 20.03.22 um 22:54 schrieb Jean-Noël Avila via GitGitGadget:
> This is another i18n PR (and hopefully the last for a while).
> 
> As usual, the intent is kept the same: curbing the number of strings to
> translate, remove constant, error prone parts out of the way, trying in some
> sense to "put a precedent" so that the template strings can be reused later.

I feel that many of the example conversions look like sentence lego
because there remains only one English word, e.g., "'%s' failed". The
converted code does not leave a hint for the translators what the %s
will be. Is it a command, a function name, somehting else? Even if the
hint was provided, different translations may be required depending on
the substituted entity. Did you investigate the existing translations
whether all of them can be converted to the new scheme?

> This series has also a RFC status: can "bad argument" messages be merged
> with unrecognized argument?

The cases that patch 7/7 transforms look like they need not keep
"unrecognized argument", but can be converted to "bad argument".

Disclaimer: neither am I a translator nor a user of a translated Git.

-- Hannes



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux