When reset_repository_shallow() is called, Git clears its cache of shallow information, so that if shallow information is re-requested, Git will read fresh data from disk instead of reusing its stale cached data. However, the cache of commit grafts is not likewise cleared, even though there are commit grafts created from shallow information. This means that if on-disk shallow information were to be updated and then a commit-graft-using codepath were run (for example, a revision walk), Git would be using stale commit graft information. This can be seen from the test in this patch, in which Git performs a revision walk (to check for changed submodules) after a fetch with --update-shallow. Therefore, clear the cache of commit grafts whenever reset_repository_shallow() is called. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx> --- This is the same bug noticed by Glen Choo, as can be seen by the patch here [1]. (That patch doesn't seem to be carried forward to subsequent versions of the patch set, presumably because it is not needed in that patch set.) I have verified that Glen's test also works with the fix in this patch. But I have written a test in t5537-fetch-shallow instead, as I think that this is more about updating shallows than fetching submodules. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20220215172318.73533-9-chooglen@xxxxxxxxxx/ --- commit.c | 10 ++++++++++ commit.h | 1 + shallow.c | 1 + submodule.c | 1 + t/t5537-fetch-shallow.sh | 9 +++++++++ 5 files changed, 22 insertions(+) diff --git a/commit.c b/commit.c index d400f5dfa2..f8405fe46e 100644 --- a/commit.c +++ b/commit.c @@ -249,6 +249,16 @@ int for_each_commit_graft(each_commit_graft_fn fn, void *cb_data) return ret; } +void reset_commit_grafts(struct repository *r) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < r->parsed_objects->grafts_nr; i++) + free(r->parsed_objects->grafts[i]); + r->parsed_objects->grafts_nr = 0; + r->parsed_objects->commit_graft_prepared = 0; +} + struct commit_buffer { void *buffer; unsigned long size; diff --git a/commit.h b/commit.h index 38cc542661..336e0bfa42 100644 --- a/commit.h +++ b/commit.h @@ -249,6 +249,7 @@ int commit_graft_pos(struct repository *r, const struct object_id *oid); int register_commit_graft(struct repository *r, struct commit_graft *, int); void prepare_commit_graft(struct repository *r); struct commit_graft *lookup_commit_graft(struct repository *r, const struct object_id *oid); +void reset_commit_grafts(struct repository *r); struct commit *get_fork_point(const char *refname, struct commit *commit); diff --git a/shallow.c b/shallow.c index 71e5876f37..e158be58b0 100644 --- a/shallow.c +++ b/shallow.c @@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ static void reset_repository_shallow(struct repository *r) { r->parsed_objects->is_shallow = -1; stat_validity_clear(r->parsed_objects->shallow_stat); + reset_commit_grafts(r); } int commit_shallow_file(struct repository *r, struct shallow_lock *lk) diff --git a/submodule.c b/submodule.c index 5ace18a7d9..7a0515913c 100644 --- a/submodule.c +++ b/submodule.c @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #include "parse-options.h" #include "object-store.h" #include "commit-reach.h" +#include "shallow.h" static int config_update_recurse_submodules = RECURSE_SUBMODULES_OFF; static int initialized_fetch_ref_tips; diff --git a/t/t5537-fetch-shallow.sh b/t/t5537-fetch-shallow.sh index 11d5ea54a9..92948de7a0 100755 --- a/t/t5537-fetch-shallow.sh +++ b/t/t5537-fetch-shallow.sh @@ -161,6 +161,15 @@ test_expect_success 'fetch --update-shallow' ' ) ' +test_expect_success 'fetch --update-shallow into a repo with submodules' ' + git init a-submodule && + test_commit -C a-submodule foo && + git init repo-with-sub && + git -C repo-with-sub submodule add ../a-submodule a-submodule && + git -C repo-with-sub commit -m "added submodule" && + git -C repo-with-sub fetch --update-shallow ../shallow/.git refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/shallow/* +' + test_expect_success 'fetch --update-shallow (with fetch.writeCommitGraph)' ' ( cd shallow && -- 2.35.1.894.gb6a874cedc-goog
