Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] fetch --recurse-submodules: fetch unpopulated submodules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Glen Choo <chooglen@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Glen Choo <chooglen@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> To clarify, does this opinion of "don't use config values that aren't
>>> copied into .git/config" extend to in-tree .gitmodules? Prior to this
>>> series, we always read the in-tree .gitmodules to get the config - the
>>> user does not need to copy the settings to .git/config, but we don't
>>> pick a commit to read .gitmodules from.
>>
>> I think we do, but I also think it was a huge mistake to allow
>> repository data to directly affect the behaviour of local checkout.
>
> I'm inclined to agree.
>
>> Fixing that is most likely outside the scope of this series, though.
>
> Agree. Thanks!

I thought that this would have been the end of the discussion, but after
reading <xmqqa6dpllmc.fsf@gitster.g>, I guess I had the wrong impression
(oops).

If I am reading everything correctly, we both agree that it's not
good to read _any_ config values from .gitmodules (even if it's
in-tree), and that we should clean it up outside of this topic. So for
this topic to be merged into 'next', is it enough to say that I will fix
this behavior in a follow up topic?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux