Glen Choo <chooglen@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Interesting, I'll take note. I'm still personally not keen on supporting > CommonJS-only patterns when we are purportedly trying to show diffs for > JavaScript, but if we think this fits the style, I'm happy to oblige. The question is, with these patterns that are aware of CommonJS convention, would your bog-standard-and-boring vanilla JS code be detected incorrectly? Becoming aware of popular conventions without hurting others would be a good thing. And the "popular conventions" does not have to be limited to CommonJS/Node.
