Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] A design for future-proofing fsync() configuration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hmph, this seems to make one test fail.
>
> t5801-remote-helpers.sh (Wstat: 256 Tests: 31 Failed: 4)
>   Failed tests:  14-16, 31
>     Non-zero exit status: 1
> Files=1, Tests=31,  2 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr  0.00 sys + 1.40 cusr  1.62 csys =  3.06 CPU)
> Result: FAIL

False alarm.  This byitself, or merged to 'seen' with other random
topics, no longer seem to break these tests.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux