"Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I'm calling this series part 2.5. It should be inserted between parts 2 and > 3. I'll send a new version of part 3 after I send part 2.5. > > This series is a bunch of "fixup!" commits for part 2. It addresses feedback > on part 2 that wasn't received until after part 2 had graduated to "next". Better late than never, but I am sensing that part 2 was under-reviewed and we pushed it too hastily? > I was originally planning to include them at the beginning of part 3, but > since there are so many, I thought it would be easier to add a fixup series > in the middle. I think that is prudent. Let's give part 3 (which ought to be more interesting than part 2.5) a more solid ground to build upon, and to prepare for that, let's first avoid repeating the mistake of merging a series in an under-reviewed state to 'next'. Will queue (but not tonight). Thanks.
