Re: Bug with rebase and commit hashes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hey Michael!

On 11 Mar 2022, at 22:10, Michael McClimon wrote:

> Thanks both! I had a look at this on the couch this evening, and with the
> caveat that I am not at all a C programmer, I think have a patch that fixes
> it:
>
> diff --git a/builtin/rebase.c b/builtin/rebase.c
> index b29ad2b6..82fb5e2c 100644
> --- a/builtin/rebase.c
> +++ b/builtin/rebase.c
> @@ -829,6 +829,8 @@ static int checkout_up_to_date(struct rebase_options *options)
>         ropts.oid = &options->orig_head;
>         ropts.branch = options->head_name;
>         ropts.flags = RESET_HEAD_RUN_POST_CHECKOUT_HOOK;
> +       if (!ropts.branch)
> +               ropts.flags |= RESET_HEAD_DETACH;
>         ropts.head_msg = buf.buf;
>         if (reset_head(the_repository, &ropts) < 0)
>                 ret = error(_("could not switch to %s"), options->switch_to);
>

Thanks for looking into this yourself! I actually have a patch out already [1],
which is pretty similar to what you suggested.

1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.1226.v2.git.git.1647019492.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx/
>
> I haven't yet run the entire test suite, but I did run all the t*-rebase*
> tests, which passed, including Junio's up-thread here. If this seems not
> totally off-base, then I'll actually read the "my first contribution" docs and
> send in a proper patch and whatnot.
>
> -- 
> Michael McClimon
> michael@xxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux