Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] core.fsyncmethod: add writeout-only mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> From: Neeraj Singh <neerajsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This commit introduces the `core.fsyncMethod` configuration
> knob, which can currently be set to `fsync` or `writeout-only`.
>
> The new writeout-only mode attempts to tell the operating system to
> flush its in-memory page cache to the storage hardware without issuing a
> CACHE_FLUSH command to the storage controller.
>
> Writeout-only fsync is significantly faster than a vanilla fsync on
> common hardware, since data is written to a disk-side cache rather than
> all the way to a durable medium. Later changes in this patch series will
> take advantage of this primitive to implement batching of hardware
> flushes.
>
> When git_fsync is called with FSYNC_WRITEOUT_ONLY, it may fail and the
> caller is expected to do an ordinary fsync as needed.
>
> On Apple platforms, the fsync system call does not issue a CACHE_FLUSH
> directive to the storage controller. This change updates fsync to do
> fcntl(F_FULLFSYNC) to make fsync actually durable. We maintain parity
> with existing behavior on Apple platforms by setting the default value
> of the new core.fsyncMethod option.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Singh <neerajsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

OK.  This seems to be quite reasonable in that the pieces of code
that use fsync_or_die() do not have to change at all, and all of
them will keep behaving the same way.  In other words, the "how" of
fsync is very much well isolated.

Nice.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux