Hi Ævar, On Wed, 23 Feb 2022, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > On Wed, Feb 23 2022, Phillip Wood wrote: > > > If I understand the rest of the message correctly we're left with > > having to expand print-test-failures and searching for "not ok" to > > find out what went wrong with this series. > > Yes, it's a non-goal of this series to directly improve or change the > "prove" output, or to replace or change the functioning of > ci/print-test-failures.sh. Since it is explicitly _not_ the goal of this series, but of the series I offered for review in https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.1117.v2.git.1646130289.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx/ (with which this here patch series conflicts rather intentionally), I suggest that your patch series can wait a little longer and build on top of mine. We do have the rule in the Git project to try to avoid conflicting with patch series that are already in flight. It just makes the lives of all involved parties so much easier. Thanks, Johannes
