Re: jc/stash-drop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Thu, Mar 03 2022, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> * jc/stash-drop (2022-03-02) 3 commits
>>  - stash: call reflog_delete() in reflog.c
>>  - reflog: libify delete reflog function and helpers
>>  - stash: add tests to ensure reflog --rewrite --updatref behavior
>>
>>  "git stash drop" is reimplemented as an internal call to
>>  reflog_delete() function, instead of invoking "git reflog delete"
>>  via run_command() API.
>>
>>  Will merge to 'next'?
>>  source: <pull.1218.v4.git.git.1646260044.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> I've been reviewing this closely & it looks good to me, all feedback has
> been addressed, and there's nothing outstanding (there's one sub-thread
> on v4 answering a question from Phillip Wood asking if the new test
> needs REFFILES, it does).

I think this one is good, and I agree that we should leave the "old
side is not even visible to regular users and tests need to peek
into the implementation detail of the log files---do we need the
--rewrite option at all, instead of doing so always?" outside the
topic.

Thanks.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux