Re: [PATCH 11/11] bundle: unbundle promisor packs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 23 2022, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote:

> From: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> In order to have a valid pack-file after unbundling a bundle that has
> the 'filter' capability, we need to generate a .promisor file. The
> bundle does not promise _where_ the objects can be found, but we can
> expect that these bundles will be unbundled in repositories with
> appropriate promisor remotes that can find those missing objects.
>
> Use the 'git index-pack --promisor=<message>' option to create this
> .promisor file. Add "from-bundle" as the message to help anyone diagnose
> issues with these promisor packs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  bundle.c               | 4 ++++
>  t/t6020-bundle-misc.sh | 8 +++++++-
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/bundle.c b/bundle.c
> index e284ef63062..3d97de40ef0 100644
> --- a/bundle.c
> +++ b/bundle.c
> @@ -631,6 +631,10 @@ int unbundle(struct repository *r, struct bundle_header *header,
>  	struct child_process ip = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
>  	strvec_pushl(&ip.args, "index-pack", "--fix-thin", "--stdin", NULL);
>  
> +	/* If there is a filter, then we need to create the promisor pack. */
> +	if (header->filter)
> +		strvec_push(&ip.args, "--promisor=from-bundle");
> +
>  	if (extra_index_pack_args) {
>  		strvec_pushv(&ip.args, extra_index_pack_args->v);
>  		strvec_clear(extra_index_pack_args);
> diff --git a/t/t6020-bundle-misc.sh b/t/t6020-bundle-misc.sh
> index 39cfefafb65..344af34db1e 100755
> --- a/t/t6020-bundle-misc.sh
> +++ b/t/t6020-bundle-misc.sh
> @@ -513,7 +513,13 @@ do
>  		The bundle uses this filter: $filter
>  		The bundle records a complete history.
>  		EOF
> -		test_cmp expect actual
> +		test_cmp expect actual &&
> +
> +		# This creates the first pack-file in the
> +		# .git/objects/pack directory. Look for a .promisor.
> +		git bundle unbundle partial.bdl &&
> +		ls .git/objects/pack/pack-*.promisor >promisor &&
> +		test_line_count = 1 promisor
>  	'
>  done

Aside from what Junio mentioned, the preceding commit seems to be
incomplete here. I.e. I'd expect to see this replace a case where we
died or whatever before. What happened if we invoked "unbundle" before?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux