Re: History over-simplification

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



linux@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:

> These seem like roundabout ways of expressing the requirement.
> The desired rule is "no silent changes in the simplified history".
> E.g. if the revision history of a particular file is:
>
>       +-C-+
>      /     \
> A---B       B---D
>      \     /
>       +-B-+
>
> Then the normal code will notice that there are no changes on the
> lower branch, prune the merge entirely, and simplify to A---B---C---D.
> This is, however, misleading; the true history is A---B---C---B---D.

Do you denote the same content with the same letter in the
above?

If so, wouldn't the simplified history be just A-B-D?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux