Re: [PATCH v3 09/10] fetch: fetch unpopulated, changed submodules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 26 Feb 2022, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> A few tests added by this patch have been failing on one specific
>> job (linux-gcc ubuntu-latest) at GitHub CI.
>>
>> https://github.com/git/git/runs/5341052811?check_suite_focus=true#step:5:3968
>> https://github.com/git/git/runs/5343133021?check_suite_focus=true#step:4:5520
>>
>>     Side note: you may need to be logged in to GitHub to view them.
>>     These two use different versions of CI to show the test traces;
>>     in the latter you may have to click on right-facing rectangle on
>>     the line with label "5520" to see the breakage.
>>
>> I think there is some baked-in assumption in the failing test what
>> the name of the initial branch by default is, which may be the reason
>> why this particular job fails while others don't.
>>
>> Can you take a look at it?
>
> The log says this:
> ...
> At least that's how _I_ tried to address similar issues in the test suite
> in the past.

Yes, I had a squashable fix/workaround queued since last night.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux