On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 1:21 AM Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@xxxxxx> wrote: > did you mean to answer only privately? No, mea culpa :( > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 10:32:16PM +0100, Erik Cervin Edin wrote: > >What's the connection to the original thread [...]? > > > that depends on what you want to interpret into the original thread, > given that a bunch of use cases and solutions were mentioned. my > solution is actually functionally identical to one of the later > subthreads, as i found after the fact. Sorry but it's a long thread and at least I am unsure which parts you are referring to and how your script fits into that. > >Maybe you could explain it a bit in the context of the problem. > > > there really isn't much to it. the git log + git reset are the essence. > just run it in the middle of an interactive rebase to see yourself. Could you elaborate on the intended/usual flow here? Rebase => Get conflict => Fix conflict => run the script => ..??
