On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 2:34 PM Victoria Dye via GitGitGadget
<gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Victoria Dye <vdye@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> When 'git read-tree' is provided with a prefix, expand the index only if the
> prefix is equivalent to a sparse directory or contained within one. If the
> index is not expanded in these cases, 'ce_in_traverse_path' will indicate
> that the relevant sparse directory is not in the prefix/traverse path,
> skipping past it and not unpacking the appropriate tree(s).
>
> If the prefix is in-cone, its sparse subdirectories (if any) will be
> traversed correctly without index expansion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> builtin/read-tree.c | 3 +--
> t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh | 8 ++++++-
> unpack-trees.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/read-tree.c b/builtin/read-tree.c
> index c2fdbc2657f..a7b7f822281 100644
> --- a/builtin/read-tree.c
> +++ b/builtin/read-tree.c
> @@ -213,8 +213,7 @@ int cmd_read_tree(int argc, const char **argv, const char *cmd_prefix)
> if (opts.merge && !opts.index_only)
> setup_work_tree();
>
> - /* TODO: audit sparse index behavior in unpack_trees */
> - if (opts.skip_sparse_checkout || opts.prefix)
> + if (opts.skip_sparse_checkout)
> ensure_full_index(&the_index);
>
> if (opts.merge) {
> diff --git a/t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh b/t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh
> index ae44451a0a9..a404be0a10f 100755
> --- a/t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh
> +++ b/t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh
> @@ -1415,7 +1415,13 @@ test_expect_success 'sparse index is not expanded: read-tree' '
> do
> ensure_not_expanded read-tree -mu $MERGE_TREES &&
> ensure_not_expanded reset --hard HEAD || return 1
> - done
> + done &&
> +
> + rm -rf sparse-index/deep/deeper2 &&
> + ensure_not_expanded add . &&
> + ensure_not_expanded commit -m "test" &&
> +
> + ensure_not_expanded read-tree --prefix=deep/deeper2 -u deepest
> '
>
> test_expect_success 'ls-files' '
> diff --git a/unpack-trees.c b/unpack-trees.c
> index 360844bda3a..dba122a02bb 100644
> --- a/unpack-trees.c
> +++ b/unpack-trees.c
> @@ -1739,6 +1739,36 @@ int unpack_trees(unsigned len, struct tree_desc *t, struct unpack_trees_options
> setup_standard_excludes(o->dir);
> }
>
> + /*
> + * If the prefix is equal to or contained within a sparse directory, the
> + * index needs to be expanded to traverse with the specified prefix.
> + */
> + if (o->prefix && o->src_index->sparse_index) {
> + int prefix_len = strlen(o->prefix);
> +
> + while (prefix_len > 0 && o->prefix[prefix_len - 1] == '/')
> + prefix_len--;
> +
> + if (prefix_len > 0) {
Is this condition check necessary? If we want some safety check here,
could it instead be something like
if (prefix_len <= 0)
BUG("Broken prefix passed to unpack_trees");
and then dedent the following code? (Or are callers allowed to not
sanitize their input before passing to unpack_trees(), meaning that we
should use a die() rather than a BUG()?)
To test this idea, near the top of unpack_trees(), I added:
if (o->prefix)
assert(*o->prefix && *o->prefix != '/');
and reran all tests. They all ran without hitting that assertion. FWIW.
> + struct strbuf ce_prefix = STRBUF_INIT;
> + strbuf_grow(&ce_prefix, prefix_len + 1);
> + strbuf_add(&ce_prefix, o->prefix, prefix_len);
> + strbuf_addch(&ce_prefix, '/');
> +
> + /*
> + * If the prefix is not inside the sparse cone, then the
> + * index is explicitly expanded if it is found as a sparse
> + * directory, or implicitly expanded (by 'index_name_pos')
> + * if the path is inside a sparse directory.
> + */
> + if (!path_in_cone_mode_sparse_checkout(ce_prefix.buf, o->src_index) &&
> + index_name_pos(o->src_index, ce_prefix.buf, ce_prefix.len) >= 0)
style nit: Can you rewrap both the comments and the code at 80 characters?
It took me a bit of playing and testing to understand these two lines.
The comment helps, but it's still a bit dense to unpack; somehow I
didn't understand that the comment was referring to index_name_pos()'s
call to ensure_full_index(). Once I understood that, it all looks
good.
> + ensure_full_index(o->src_index);
> +
> + strbuf_release(&ce_prefix);
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (!core_apply_sparse_checkout || !o->update)
> o->skip_sparse_checkout = 1;
> if (!o->skip_sparse_checkout && !o->pl) {
> --
> gitgitgadget
