Re: diffcore-rename performance mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 12:38:43PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:

[...]

What is most confusing is why the 'somefree' case performs so badly,
since we should just be using the cnt_data. I'll see if gprof can shed

OK, I found the problem. estimate_similarity calls
diff_populate_filespec each time, even if we already have the cnt_data,
which leads to recomputing the blob contents from deltas. Oops.

Fixing this, the correct numbers are:

                 | stock | nofree | old somefree | fixed somefree
-----------------|-----------------------------------------------
user time (s)    | 76.78 | 16.96  | 46.26        | 16.99
peak memory (Kb) | 52300 | 66796  | 59156        | 57328

So now we're at a 4.5x speedup for about 10% extra memory usage. Patch
will follow.


Nice work :)

--
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@xxxxxx
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux