Re: [PATCH 0/2] microproject: avoid using pipes in test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 6:22 AM Shubham Mishra <shivam828787@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > > This is my first contribution that's why I am keeping diff short with an intention to understand the process instead of making impactful change in first attempt. Later, I will send more patches to fix the issue for other files.
> >
> > Please read the "Only ONE quality focused microproject per student"
> > section of the above mentioned page.
>
> here I mean in next patches, I will be fixing the same "Git on LHS of
> pipe" for other tests. I think that will be considered as the same
> microproject and I am still eligible to fix the same thing for other
> files?

In the "Only ONE quality focused microproject per student" section, there is:

=> This means that for a microproject that consist in refactoring or
rewriting a small amount of code, your patch should change only ONE
file, or perhaps 2 files if they are closely related, like “foo.c” and
“foo.h”.

So, no, we really prefer you to focus on 1 file (or 2 files when they
are strongly related) and then move on to your application or regular
patches, reviews, discussions, etc.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux