Re: When rebase.autoStash=true is used, 'git pull' merge process still complains when incoming changes are in a different place of the file than local changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 17/02/2022 20:50, Yuri wrote:
>> I have a file "x" that has one local change and some incoming pulled
>> changes.
>> Pulled changes are contextually very far away, so it should be
>> possible to merge them without user interaction.
>> But git still complains:
>> $ git pull
>> Updating 91bfe02..522ccf2
>> error: Your local changes to the following files would be
>> overwritten by merge:
>>      x
>
> pull only uses rebase.autoStash if you ask it to rebase, if it is
> trying to merge then you need to pass --autostash on the command line
> or set merge.autoStash (assuming you want merge to always use
> --autostash).

I wonder if it would make a good #leftoverbit starter project to
introduce pull.autoStash so that those who want autostash only when
running "git pull" (but not "git merge" or "git rebase") can set it,
ignoring the settings of merge/rebase.autoStash variables.

Thanks.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux