Re: [PATCH 0/2] Specify the actual pack size limit which is breached

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 04:03:11PM +0000, Matt Cooper via GitGitGadget wrote:
> Matt Cooper (2):
>   index-pack: clarify the breached limit
>   t5302: confirm that large packs mention limit
>
>  builtin/index-pack.c  | 8 ++++++--
>  t/t5302-pack-index.sh | 8 ++++++++
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

I took a look and reviewed this series internally. The patches here
match what I looked at within GitHub, so these look good to me also.

For what it's worth, I wouldn't mind to see these two patches squashed
together, since it may be easier for future readers to see the new code
and test together in the same patch.

But I don't feel strongly about it, so (with or without that suggestion)
I'd be happy to see this get picked up. Thanks, Matt!

Thanks,
Taylor



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux