"Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > +If the working tree for a a linked worktree is stored on a portable device a a. I've prepared the following to be squashed locally. I also have another small one for 06/11. Since 05/11-11/11 all share exactly the same subject, I am not sure how well "git rebase -i --autosquash" would work, though. I suspect it would so very poorly. Subject: [PATCH] fixup! worktree: use 'worktree' over 'working tree' --- Documentation/git-worktree.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/git-worktree.txt b/Documentation/git-worktree.txt index 1243332d72..46afc7224f 100644 --- a/Documentation/git-worktree.txt +++ b/Documentation/git-worktree.txt @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ its associated administrative files, which reside in the repository `git worktree prune` in the main or any linked worktree to clean up any stale administrative files. -If the working tree for a a linked worktree is stored on a portable device +If the working tree for a linked worktree is stored on a portable device or network share which is not always mounted, you can prevent its administrative files from being pruned by issuing the `git worktree lock` command, optionally specifying `--reason` to explain why the worktree is -- 2.35.1-273-ge6ebfd0e8c
