Re: [PATCH 2/2] hooks: fix a TOCTOU in "did we run a hook?" heuristic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 09:43:52PM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> diff --git a/builtin/commit.c b/builtin/commit.c
> index b9ed0374e30..bc5d34bc31f 100644
> --- a/builtin/commit.c
> +++ b/builtin/commit.c
> @@ -725,11 +725,13 @@ static int prepare_to_commit(const char *index_file, const char *prefix,
>  	int clean_message_contents = (cleanup_mode != COMMIT_MSG_CLEANUP_NONE);
>  	int old_display_comment_prefix;
>  	int merge_contains_scissors = 0;
> +	int invoked_hook;
>
>  	/* This checks and barfs if author is badly specified */
>  	determine_author_info(author_ident);
>
> -	if (!no_verify && run_commit_hook(use_editor, index_file, "pre-commit", NULL))
> +	if (!no_verify && run_commit_hook(use_editor, index_file, &invoked_hook,
> +					  "pre-commit", NULL))
>  		return 0;
>
>  	if (squash_message) {
> @@ -1052,10 +1054,10 @@ static int prepare_to_commit(const char *index_file, const char *prefix,
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>
> -	if (!no_verify && hook_exists("pre-commit")) {
> +	if (!no_verify && invoked_hook) {
>  		/*
> -		 * Re-read the index as pre-commit hook could have updated it,
> -		 * and write it out as a tree.  We must do this before we invoke
> +		 * Re-read the index as the pre-commit-commit hook was invoked
> +		 * and could have updated it. We must do this before we invoke
>  		 * the editor and after we invoke run_status above.
>  		 */
>  		discard_cache();

Sanity checking my own understating of this race: if we ran the
pre-commit hook and it modified the index, but hook_exists() returns
false later on (e.g., because the hook itself went away, the directory
became unreadable, etc.), then we won't call discard_cache() when we
should have?

If so, OK. This definitely seems like a pretty niche race, but
independent of that I think the change here is an improvement in
readability, and makes it clearer that calling discard_cache() depends
on whether or not we *ran* the pre-commit hook, not whether we (still)
*have* a pre-commit hook.

Thanks,
Taylor



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux