On Wed, Feb 16 2022, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Merlin (they/them) via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> > writes: > >> These changes make this documentation more inclusive. > > I am not sure about this claim, though. > >> * Using "male" and "female" as examples of gender is unnecessary. > > It feels somewhat more excluding for those of us who are non-native > speakers to use a heavier-weight word "gender". After all, it warns > against writing "he", "him", "she" or "her"---the reason why we warn > against the first two is because the author has to implicitly assume > the person in question is "male". Similarly the latter two needs to > assume "female". These two words, "male" and "female", are both > easier to understand to even non-native speakers like us, and at the > same time quite in line with the suggestion being offered. > > Maybe the motivation behind this change is a misunderstanding that > somehow the original of what this patch touches says that "male" and > "female" are the only two possible values of "gender", but I cannot > read it that way even when I squint my eyes. Isn't that exactly what it's saying? I.e. for the purposes of the English used in our documentation there's two grammatical genders "he ran the program", "she ran the program" and gender-neutral "it/they ran the program". >> * The use of "it" shouldn't be used to refer to people even in an >> example of what not to use. People are never "it"s. > > People are never "it", but I do not think that is relevant. Reading > the original of what this patch touches, the subject is either a > person or a program, and for program, referring to "it" would be > perfectly sensible, no? Yes, as the person who wrote this originally (in https://lore.kernel.org/git/87a6nz2fda.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/) that's what I was going for. It's referring to describing a program as "it". >> * There's no need to specify a person or group of people that learned >> "they" is only plural. > > Again, this change assumes/requires too much knowledge of the > language, which is more excluding for non-natives who may think > there is only one kind of the English language taught everywhere in > the world uniformly unless told explicitly. If you are familiar, > there may be "no need", but does it actively hurt those of you who > are familiar if the explanation gives such an example? Removing it > may actively hurt those who did learn English as a second language. > > So, I can applaud for the desire to be inclusive, but I am not sure > if the patch succeeds in doing so. Per what I noted the last time this was discussed I think that we should mostly drop this section entirely in favor of some guidelines describing how to actually write the docs that we do write, not what not to do in the rare/nonexistent cases of using grammatical genders: https://lore.kernel.org/git/87pmwt1dz3.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ brian's follow-up provides a good example of what we try to aim for: https://lore.kernel.org/git/YMKTARn368Qzsqc2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ The thing that's uninclusive here is asking non-native speakers of English who are trying to contribute to this project to grasp some fairly advanced linguistic concepts. I think it's fair to say that the use of "they" as a personal pronoun is fairly new/novel English language as it's commonly understood. I.e. if you talk to any person who's not a native-level speaker of English it's a fair assumption that their introductory textbook didn't cover it. As noted in those old threads I'm entirely sympathetic to the goal of avoiding gendered language if it's a thing that matters for some readers, which clearly it does[1]. It just demonstrably isn't relevant to our documentation in practice, so this whole advice ends up being a bridge to nowhere. It's comparable to us carrying C++ coding guide lines in-tree. 1. To be fair, I do find it a bit odd, but then again I'm a non-native speaker, and I'm unable to refer to even the monitor, keyboard and laptop I'm using to type this in my in my native language without assigning the three (different!) genders. I can assure the concerned native English speakers that by all accounts Iceland's got a rather good track record when it comes to gender equlity despite that :)
