Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I wouldn't go so far as to characterize it as a disagreement. In my > review, I only pointed out that this series was introducing some new > instances of inconsistency which some earlier efforts (started by > Michael Haggerty) had eliminated. As mentioned in [2], I personally > prefer the term "worktree". These two words mean different things, so I am not sure there is much room for personal preference. If what a documentation refers to is the working tree plus its administrative files, referring to the whole as a "worktree" would be more precise and concise. If the discussion is only about the thing above .git/ that the editors and the compilers see, "working tree" is the right term to use.
