Re: [PATCH 2/7] sparse-checkout: correctly set non-cone mode when expected

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 7:44 AM Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2/12/2022 7:39 PM, Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget wrote:
> > From: Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > commit f2e3a218e8 ("sparse-checkout: enable `set` to initialize
> > sparse-checkout mode", 2021-12-14) made the `set` command able to
> > intialize sparse-checkout mode, but it also had to function when
>
> s/intialize/initialize/

Thanks.

> > sparse-checkout mode was already setup and the user just wanted to
> > change the sparsity paths.  So, if the user passed --cone or --no-cone,
> > then we should override the current setting, but if they didn't pass
> > either, we should use whatever the current cone mode setting is.
> >
> > Unfortunately, there was a small error in the logic in that it would not
> > set the in-memory cone mode value (core_sparse_checkout_one) when
> > --no-cone was specified, but since it did set the config setting on
> > disk, any subsequent git invocation would correctly get non-cone mode.
> > As such, the error did not previously matter.  However, a sbusequent
>
> s/sbusequent/subsequent/

Likewise.

> > commit will add some logic that depends on core_sparse_checkout_cone
> > being set to the correct mode, so make sure it is set consistently with
> > the config values we will be writing to disk.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  builtin/sparse-checkout.c | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/builtin/sparse-checkout.c b/builtin/sparse-checkout.c
> > index 510cb89b544..8d595189ea3 100644
> > --- a/builtin/sparse-checkout.c
> > +++ b/builtin/sparse-checkout.c
> > @@ -399,6 +399,8 @@ static int update_modes(int *cone_mode, int *sparse_index)
> >               core_sparse_checkout_cone = 1;
> >       } else {
> >               mode = MODE_ALL_PATTERNS;
> > +             if (record_mode)
> > +                     core_sparse_checkout_cone = 0;
>
> Is there a special reason why this is guarded by "if (record_mode)"?

It turns out it's not needed.

I was worried about changing core_sparse_checkout_cone when we got to
this function without either --cone or --no-cone mode being specified,
but re-checking the code, in such a case *cone_mode would have been
set to core_sparse_checkout_cone a few lines above, so setting
core_sparse_checkout_cone unconditionally here is safe.  I will remove
the check.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux