Shaoxuan Yuan <shaoxuan.yuan02@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 3:12 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Shaoxuan Yuan <shaoxuan.yuan02@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> > Since I didn't see this change in seen or next, do you plan to apply it?
>>
>> I actually wasn't, as my understanding of it was primarily your
>> practice.
>
> Understood, thanks for the reply.
FWIW, I have the posted patch plus the following SQUASH??? fix-up
parked in the 'seen' branch. As the script is quiescent right now,
I do not mind merging it down, now we spent more time on it ;-)
t/t0001-init.sh | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/t/t0001-init.sh b/t/t0001-init.sh
index c72a28d3a5..d479303efa 100755
--- a/t/t0001-init.sh
+++ b/t/t0001-init.sh
@@ -6,7 +6,8 @@ TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true
. ./test-lib.sh
check_config () {
- if test_path_is_dir "$1" && test_path_is_file "$1/config" && test_path_is_dir "$1/refs"
+ if test_path_is_dir "$1" &&
+ test_path_is_file "$1/config" && test_path_is_dir "$1/refs"
then
: happy
else
--
2.35.1-102-g2b9c120970
