On Friday 21 September 2007 23:24:43 David Brown wrote: > On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 02:15:10PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >Simon Hausmann <simon@xxxxxx> writes: > >> On Friday 21 September 2007 00:53:52 Junio C Hamano wrote: > >>> David Brown <git@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 09:03:50PM +0200, Simon Hausmann wrote: > >>> >>On Wednesday 19 September 2007 20:15:03 David Brown wrote: > >>> >>> git-p4 was missing the execute bit setting if the file had other > >>> >>> attribute bits set. > >>> >>> --- > >>> >> > >>> >>I'm fine with this, so unless you find a better way: > >>> >> > >>> >>Acked-By: Simon Hausmann <simon@xxxxxx> > >>> > > >>> > I sent out an improved version of this patch yesterday > >>> > <1190232768445-git-send-email-git@xxxxxxxxxx> that I'd like to get > >>> > approved. I guess I'm not quite sure what happens at this point with > >>> > a patch. > >>> > >>> I still have that *768445* message as "the last one proposed as > >>> better than previous ones" in my mbox. > >>> > >>> Simon? > >> > >> Indeed, the new improved version is much better :) > >> > >> Acked-By: Simon Hausmann <simon@xxxxxx> > > > >Thanks. This should go to 'maint' (part of v1.5.3.3) right? > > Sounds good by me. I've been using it on a few other repos, and haven't > had any problems. Agreed. Simon
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
