Re: [PATCH 05/10] object-file API: provide a hash_object_file_oideq()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason  <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Provide a new hash_object_file_oideq() for those callers of
> check_object_signature() that don't care about its streaming
> interface. I.e. at the start of that function we do:
>
> 	if (map) {
> 		hash_object_file(r->hash_algo, map, size, type, real_oid);
> 		return !oideq(oid, real_oid) ? -1 : 0;
> 	}
>
> These callers always provide a "map" (or "buf[fer]"). Let's have them
> call this simpler hash_object_file_oideq() function instead.
>
> None of them use a non-NULL "real_oid" argument, but let's provide it
> like check_object_signature() did. This'll make it easy to have these
> emit better error messages in the future as was done in
> 96e41f58fe1 (fsck: report invalid object type-path combinations,
> 2021-10-01), i.e. the die() calls here can emit not only the OID we
> expected, but also what we got.

This has a potential to moving us in the wrong direction when made
to code paths that currently fully slurp an object in-core but may
want to shrink the memory footprint by using streaming API more.

Having said that, I think all of these want to also use the in-core
version of hte object data (mostly to write them out), and they need
more work to move them in the other direction, so I'd say it is OK
to introduce the new helper to simplify these callsites.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux