Re: [PATCH v6 04/15] reftable: check reftable_stack_auto_compact() return value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 20 2022, Han-Wen Nienhuys via GitGitGadget wrote:

> From: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Fixes a problem detected by Coverity.

Detected by coverity, but I think it's better to describe the
issue. Here it seems to be that we didn't use the "err" at all, so
before this change the test wasn't doing anything to check that we
didn't have an error?

Or would the subsequent EXPECT() catch it in practice?

> Signed-off-by: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  reftable/stack_test.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/reftable/stack_test.c b/reftable/stack_test.c
> index f4c743db80c..e84f50d27ff 100644
> --- a/reftable/stack_test.c
> +++ b/reftable/stack_test.c
> @@ -839,6 +839,7 @@ static void test_reftable_stack_auto_compaction(void)
>  		EXPECT_ERR(err);
>  
>  		err = reftable_stack_auto_compact(st);
> +		EXPECT_ERR(err);
>  		EXPECT(i < 3 || st->merged->stack_len < 2 * fastlog2(i));
>  	}




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux