Hi, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > Thanks to both you and Petr for the report and easy to reproduce case, > and sorry about causing it. > > In retrospec it's a rather obvious thinko. Here's a minimal fix for > it, along with a derived test case that I made more exhaustive to > check the state of the repo before, after, and in-between the two "git > checkout" commands. As noted it'll also pass with 9081a421a6d > reverted, showing that our behavior is the same as before that commit. I can confirm the new test succeeds and the case which Petr reported works as it did in previous releases. Many thanks for the quick fix and more extensive tests Ævar! -- Todd
