Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] midx.c: make changing the preferred pack safe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 10:08:43AM -0800, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> I think the main issue is the first confounding factor you listed above:
> even if we didn't have the other confounding factor, that issue alone is
> enough to motivate the entire patch set. Likewise, as Junio said [1], I
> don't think we need to switch to rename() if we make the checksum
> different, so the fix is one-fold, not two-fold. For what it's worth, I
> switched back to finalize_object_file() and ran the tests, and they all
> pass.

Yeah, I agree with both of you and would rather use
finalize_object_file() here and be consistent with other callers that
modify $GIT_DIR/objects.

It is safe to do, since the .rev file's name will necessarily be
different if the MIDX's object order changes.

> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqtue54iop.fsf@gitster.g/

Thanks,
Taylor



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux