Glen Choo <chooglen@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> * ar/submodule-update (2021-10-13) 9 commits >> . submodule--helper: rename helper functions >> . submodule--helper: remove unused helpers >> . submodule: move core cmd_update() logic to C >> . submodule--helper: run update using child process struct >> . submodule--helper: allow setting superprefix for init_submodule() >> . submodule--helper: refactor get_submodule_displaypath() >> . submodule--helper: rename helpers for update-clone >> . submodule--helper: get remote names from any repository >> . submodule--helper: split up ensure_core_worktree() >> >> Rewrite of "git submodule update" in C. >> >> Expecting a reroll? >> cf. <YWiXL+plA7GHfuVv@xxxxxxxxxx> >> source: <20211013051805.45662-10-raykar.ath@xxxxxxxxx> > > How close are we to getting this into 'next'? Last I checked, it seemed > like the only remaining piece is to rebase this onto > es/superproject-aware-submodules. Unless we have a new version of, a new review or a new ack on any topic since we tagged -rc0, there should be anything to make them any closer to 'next'. In any case, a rebased version would not come from me, so I think the message I am responding to has To: and Cc: addresses mixed up.