Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > There are a few "oops, what we merged recently is broken" topics > that still are not in 'master', but otherwise what we have should > be pretty much what we'll have in the final one. > > - I am reasonably happy with ab/refs-errno-cleanup (just one patch) > that fixes the incorrect state of the code left by the earlier > parts of the topic that have already been merged during this > cycle. > > - I am also OK with ab/reftable-build-fixes (two patches), one for > general type correctness fix, the other for helping older sub-C99 > compilers. > > If there are fixes for regressions that we introduced during this > cycle other than these two topics, I certainly am missing them, so > please holler loudly and quickly, hopefully in time for me to tag > the -rc1 tomorrow. Oh, by the way, the tip of 'seen' has consistently failing the leak-check test. I didn't have chance, time or energy to see if they are failing merely because an existing test script that used to be leak-clean gained a use of command that has been known to be leak-unclean without introducing any new leaks, or our recent change did introduce new leaks to commands that have been leak-clean. Somebody with too much time on their hand should go in and check to help, before CI testing on 'seen' becomes useful again. Thanks.
