Re: [PATCH] reftable: avoid initializing structs from structs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 13 2022, Han-Wen Nienhuys via GitGitGadget wrote:

> From: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@xxxxxxxxxx>

Ah, nevermind <220113.86v8yntxfb.gmgdl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, so you
meant *want[] :)

I can confirm that this works on the xlc version that errored on this
before, the reftable tests even pass!

> Apparently, the IBM xlc compiler doesn't like this.

Would make sense to steal the compiler version etc. details from my
<patch-1.1-7425b64c0a0-20220113T113821Z-avarab@xxxxxxxxx>. I.e. eventually
we'll be able to change this & other code back, as nobody will care
about that older compiler version. It worked before in the pre-image on
a more recent xlc.

> Signed-off-by: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>     reftable: avoid initializing structs from structs
>     
>     Apparently, the IBM xlc compiler doesn't like this.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Han-Wen Nienhuys hanwen@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-git-1188%2Fhanwen%2Freftable-xlc-v1
> Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-git-1188/hanwen/reftable-xlc-v1
> Pull-Request: https://github.com/git/git/pull/1188
>
>  reftable/merged_test.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/reftable/merged_test.c b/reftable/merged_test.c
> index 24461e8a802..abd34849fca 100644
> --- a/reftable/merged_test.c
> +++ b/reftable/merged_test.c
> @@ -207,11 +207,11 @@ static void test_merged(void)
>  		},
>  	};
>  
> -	struct reftable_ref_record want[] = {
> -		r2[0],
> -		r1[1],
> -		r3[0],
> -		r3[1],
> +	struct reftable_ref_record *want[] = {
> +		&r2[0],
> +		&r1[1],
> +		&r3[0],
> +		&r3[1],
>  	};
>  
>  	struct reftable_ref_record *refs[] = { r1, r2, r3 };
> @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static void test_merged(void)
>  
>  	EXPECT(ARRAY_SIZE(want) == len);
>  	for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> -		EXPECT(reftable_ref_record_equal(&want[i], &out[i],
> +		EXPECT(reftable_ref_record_equal(want[i], &out[i],
>  						 GIT_SHA1_RAWSZ));
>  	}
>  	for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> @@ -345,10 +345,10 @@ static void test_merged_logs(void)
>  			.value_type = REFTABLE_LOG_DELETION,
>  		},
>  	};
> -	struct reftable_log_record want[] = {
> -		r2[0],
> -		r3[0],
> -		r1[1],
> +	struct reftable_log_record *want[] = {
> +		&r2[0],
> +		&r3[0],
> +		&r1[1],
>  	};
>  
>  	struct reftable_log_record *logs[] = { r1, r2, r3 };
> @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static void test_merged_logs(void)
>  
>  	EXPECT(ARRAY_SIZE(want) == len);
>  	for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> -		EXPECT(reftable_log_record_equal(&want[i], &out[i],
> +		EXPECT(reftable_log_record_equal(want[i], &out[i],
>  						 GIT_SHA1_RAWSZ));
>  	}
>  
>
> base-commit: 1ffcbaa1a5f10c9f706314d77f88de20a4a498c2




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux