Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Maybe that was the right thing to do, maybe not, but it went out with > v2.30.0 and the lack of complaints since then would seem to suggest that > I was right that removing it wouldn't be a big deal. > > Of course it may have broken someone's script somewhere. > > But an important distinction is that they can get it working again by > just copy/pasting that ~100 line shell library into their own script, or > calling the underlying commands it was invoking themselves. Was parse-remote a part of what promised our end-users? merge-tree has been since it was written. That distinction is even more important.
