Re: [PATCH v5 16/16] reftable: be more paranoid about 0-length memcpy calls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 12:39 PM Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> this series, I'll just take a closer look at the current call-sites to
> see if NULL can really occur or not.

I've dropped this patch from the series. The only suspect callsite is
in obj_record_decode(),
and that is better addressed by other changes to make sure we never
try to do a 0 length copy.

-- 
Han-Wen Nienhuys - Google Munich
I work 80%. Don't expect answers from me on Fridays.
--

Google Germany GmbH, Erika-Mann-Strasse 33, 80636 Munich

Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg

Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux