I was answering a question on StackOverflow recently about the
interaction between text=auto and eol, and someone pointed out to me
that what I had written, which was based on the documentation, was not
correct as of Git 2.10 (and more specifically 6523728499 ("convert:
unify the "auto" handling of CRLF", 2016-06-28)).
When I set out to document the behavior correctly, I ran into the fact
that the tests, where I looked for examples of how this behaves, didn't
have any tests for some of these cases, and so I had some trouble
documenting this clearly and accurately. So this series basically just
adds some tests for existing behavior so we don't change it (and so I
could figure out how it works) and then updates the documentation
accordingly.
I tried to make the docs as specific as possible, since I needed them to
be specific and accurate here, and I felt like speaking affirmatively
about the behavior would be clearer than speaking negatively about the
behavior (I tried both). I would of course be delighted to hear
suggestions on how this could be clearer or easier to understand.
I realize that 2.35.0-rc0 has just come out and so this won't be picked
up right away, which is fine, but I thought I'd send it out
nevertheless (mostly so I don't forget).
brian m. carlson (2):
t0027: add tests for eol without text in .gitattributes
docs: correct documentation about eol attribute
Documentation/gitattributes.txt | 11 ++++++-----
t/t0027-auto-crlf.sh | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
