Re: [PATCH 2/2] add support for branch.<name>.integrationonly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Lars Hjemli wrote:
>
>> +branch.<name>.integrationonly::
>
> Why not have something like branch.<name>.mergeOptions instead?

Why make it plural? I agree that it's better to have a multiple values
option than having just "true/false", which makes it more extensible,
but I don't understand the kind of things you could put here that
wouldn't be better located in a separate configuration option.

-- 
Matthieu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux