"John Cai via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> + altogether.
> ++
> +For example:
> ++
> +--
> + $ cat sample.txt
> +
> + An abbreviated revision 2ae0a9cb82 will not be substituted.
> + The full name after substitution is 2ae0a9cb8298185a94e5998086f380a355dd8907,
> + while its tree object is 70d105cc79e63b81cfdcb08a15297c23e60b07ad
> +
> + $ git name-rev --annotate-stdin <sample.txt
> +
> + An abbreviated revision 2ae0a9cb82 will not be substituted.
> + The full name after substitution is 2ae0a9cb8298185a94e5998086f380a355dd8907 (master),
> + while its tree object is 70d105cc79e63b81cfdcb08a15297c23e60b07ad
> +
> + $ git name-rev --name-only --annotate-stdin <sample.txt
> +
> + An abbreviated revision 2ae0a9cb82 will not be substituted.
> + The full name after substitution is master,
> + while its tree object is 70d105cc79e63b81cfdcb08a15297c23e60b07ad
> +--
I compared the output from the earlier ones with this one; the way
the displayed sample was shown in the previous rounds looked better,
at least in HTML pages. The earlier ones used "listingblock" in
which the sample is contained in a <pre>formatted <code> block, but
this one ends up in a series of one-<div>-per-paragraph.
> - if (transform_stdin) {
> - char buffer[2048];
> + if (annotate_stdin) {
> + struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;
This will break the compilation at this step.
