Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> @@ -613,8 +622,8 @@ int cmd_name_rev(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>> for_each_ref(name_ref, &data);
>> name_tips();
>> - if (transform_stdin) {
>> - char buffer[2048];
>> + if (annotate_stdin) {
>> + struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;
>
> I think this hunk belongs in the next patch. Before posting a patch
> series I find it helpful to run
>
> git rebase --keep-base -x'make -j4 git && cd t && prove -j4 <tests
> I think might fail> :: --root=/dev/shm'
>
> to check that the individual patches compile and pass the relevant
> tests. I've never got round to trying it but git-test[1] also lets you
> test all the commits in a series
Ahh, I saw and pointed out exactly the same mistake in an earlier
round, but failed to spot it this time around. Thanks for spotting.
