On 2022-01-04 at 21:39:37, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Another thought. As far as I can see on the C code side in the > later part of the patch, we are prepared to see multiple HAVE_* for > CSPRNG defined by the builders, and let us choose the best one for > them. I wonder if it makes sense to allow > > make CSPRNG_METHOD='arc4random getentropy' > > as a way to tell us that they have these two and want us to pick the > best one for them. > > It does not add much value for human builders, but I suspect that it > would make it simpler when we need to add autoconf support. That shouldn't be a big deal. I can do that. -- brian m. carlson (he/him or they/them) Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
