Re: Problem with merge when renaming

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano, Wed, Sep 19, 2007 01:27:01 +0200:
> > it happens with very recent git (as of today)
> >
> >>  (2) if you do "git merge -s resolve" instead of just "git
> >>      merge", do you see a difference?
> >
> > yes: it has more error output.
> >
> > Trying really trivial in-index merge...
> > warning: Merge requires file-level merging
> > Nope, a really trivial in-index merge not possible
> > Trying simple merge.
> > Simple merge failed, trying Automatic merge.
> > error: init: is a directory - add individual files instead
> > fatal: Unable to process path init
> > fatal: merge program failed
> > Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.
> 
> Isn't this the same as the known issue here?
> 
> 	<http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/53402>
> 

Yes, looks similar:

    .../git/t$ ./t3031-df-3way.sh -d -v -i
    ...
    Created commit 992a330: side moves and makes changes
     6 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 153 deletions(-)
     create mode 100644 D
     create mode 100644 D.A
     delete mode 100644 D/A
     delete mode 100644 D/B
     delete mode 100644 D/C
     create mode 100644 D0C
    *   ok 1: setup

    * expecting success: 

	    git read-tree -m initial side master


    fatal: Entry 'D/A' would be overwritten by merge. Cannot merge.
    * FAIL 2: threeway


		    git read-tree -m initial side master

    .../git/t$

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux